FREE PDF EFFICIENT THE SECOPS GROUP - CNSP VALID TEST MATERIALS

Free PDF Efficient The SecOps Group - CNSP Valid Test Materials

Free PDF Efficient The SecOps Group - CNSP Valid Test Materials

Blog Article

Tags: CNSP Valid Test Materials, CNSP Valid Exam Preparation, Exam CNSP Outline, CNSP Best Study Material, CNSP Certification Sample Questions

Features of our web-based certification for Certified Network Security Practitioner (CNSP) practice test and the desktop simulation software for The SecOps Group CNSP exam questions are similar. The web-based CNSP practice test is supported by operating systems. It is an internet-based self-assessment test, eliminating the need for any software installation. The web-based The SecOps Group CNSP Practice Exam is compatible with major browsers. Get a demo of our products, it's free to use. Upon completing the purchase, you will be able to immediately download the full version of our Exam4PDF Certified Network Security Practitioner (CNSP) practice questions product.

With the help of our CNSP Latest Dumps Pdf, you just need to spend one or two days to practice the CNSP training materials. If you remember the key points of study guide, you will pass the real exam with hit-rate. You can trust us about the valid and accuracy of The SecOps Group braindumps because it created by our experienced workers and based on the real questions.

>> CNSP Valid Test Materials <<

CNSP Valid Exam Preparation & Exam CNSP Outline

At the Exam4PDF, we guarantee that our customers will receive the best possible Certified Network Security Practitioner (CNSP) study material to pass the The SecOps Group CNSP certification exam with confidence. Joining this site for the CNSP Exam Preparation would be the greatest solution to the problem of outdated material.

The SecOps Group CNSP Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Testing Network Services
Topic 2
  • Network Scanning & Fingerprinting: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Analysts and covers techniques for probing and analyzing network hosts to gather details about open ports, operating systems, and potential vulnerabilities. It emphasizes ethical and legal considerations when performing scans.
Topic 3
  • Network Security Tools and Frameworks (such as Nmap, Wireshark, etc)
Topic 4
  • This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Engineers and explains how to verify the security and performance of various services running on a network. It focuses on identifying weaknesses in configurations and protocols that could lead to unauthorized access or data leaks.
Topic 5
  • Database Security Basics: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Engineers and covers how databases can be targeted for unauthorized access. It explains the importance of strong authentication, encryption, and regular auditing to ensure that sensitive data remains protected.
Topic 6
  • Testing Web Servers and Frameworks: This section of the exam measures skills of Security Analysts and examines how to assess the security of web technologies. It looks at configuration issues, known vulnerabilities, and the impact of unpatched frameworks on the overall security posture.
Topic 7
  • TLS Security Basics: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Analysts and outlines the process of securing network communication through encryption. It highlights how TLS ensures data integrity and confidentiality, emphasizing certificate management and secure configurations.
Topic 8
  • Linux and Windows Security Basics: This section of the exam measures skills of Security Analysts and compares foundational security practices across these two operating systems. It addresses file permissions, user account controls, and basic hardening techniques to reduce the attack surface.
Topic 9
  • TCP
  • IP (Protocols and Networking Basics): This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Analysts and covers the fundamental principles of TCP
  • IP, explaining how data moves through different layers of the network. It emphasizes the roles of protocols in enabling communication between devices and sets the foundation for understanding more advanced topics.
Topic 10
  • Active Directory Security Basics: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Engineers and introduces the fundamental concepts of directory services, highlighting potential security risks and the measures needed to protect identity and access management systems in a Windows environment.
Topic 11
  • Password Storage: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Engineers and addresses safe handling of user credentials. It explains how hashing, salting, and secure storage methods can mitigate risks associated with password disclosure or theft.
Topic 12
  • Network Discovery Protocols: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Analysts and examines how protocols like ARP, ICMP, and SNMP enable the detection and mapping of network devices. It underlines their importance in security assessments and network monitoring.
Topic 13
  • This section of the exam measures skills of Network Engineers and explores the utility of widely used software for scanning, monitoring, and troubleshooting networks. It clarifies how these tools help in detecting intrusions and verifying security configurations.
Topic 14
  • Basic Malware Analysis: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Engineers and offers an introduction to identifying malicious software. It covers simple analysis methods for recognizing malware behavior and the importance of containment strategies in preventing widespread infection.
Topic 15
  • Network Architectures, Mapping, and Target Identification: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Engineers and reviews different network designs, illustrating how to diagram and identify potential targets in a security context. It stresses the importance of accurate network mapping for efficient troubleshooting and defense.

The SecOps Group Certified Network Security Practitioner Sample Questions (Q11-Q16):

NEW QUESTION # 11
Which of the following services do not encrypt its traffic by default?

  • A. SSH
  • B. DNS
  • C. All of these
  • D. FTPS

Answer: B

Explanation:
Encryption ensures confidentiality and integrity of network traffic. Analyzing defaults:
A . DNS (Domain Name System):
Default: Unencrypted (UDP/TCP 53), per RFC 1035. Queries/responses (e.g., "google.com → 142.250.190.14") are plaintext.
Modern Options: DNS over HTTPS (DoH, TCP 443) or DNS over TLS (DoT, TCP 853) encrypt, but aren't default in most systems (e.g., pre-2020 Windows).
B . SSH (Secure Shell):
Default: Encrypted (TCP 22), per RFC 4251. Uses asymmetric (e.g., RSA) and symmetric (e.g., AES) copyright for all sessions.
C . FTPS (FTP Secure):
Default: Encrypted (TCP 21 control, dynamic data ports). Extends FTP with SSL/TLS (e.g., RFC 4217), securing file transfers.
Technical Details:
DNS: Plaintext exposes queries to eavesdropping (e.g., ISP snooping) or spoofing (e.g., cache poisoning).
SSH/FTPS: Encryption is baked into their standards; disabling it requires explicit misconfiguration.
Security Implications: Unencrypted DNS risks privacy and integrity (e.g., Kaminsky attack). CNSP likely pushes DoH/DoT adoption.
Why other options are incorrect:
B, C: Encrypt by default.
D: False, as only DNS lacks default encryption.
Real-World Context: The 2013 Snowden leaks exposed DNS monitoring; DoH uptake (e.g., Cloudflare 1.1.1.1) counters this.


NEW QUESTION # 12
Which one of the following is a phishing email?

  • A. Only A
  • B. Only B
  • C. Both A and B
  • D. None of the above

Answer: B

Explanation:
The screenshot shows an email labeled "B" with the subject "Verify your email address" purportedly from Apple. To determine if this is a phishing email, we need to analyze its content and characteristics against common phishing indicators as outlined in CNSP documentation. Since option A is not provided in the screenshot, we will evaluate email B and infer the context for A.
Analysis of Email B:
Sender and Branding: The email claims to be from "Apple Support" and includes an Apple logo, which is a common tactic to establish trust. However, phishing emails often impersonate legitimate brands like Apple to deceive users.
Subject and Content: The subject "Verify your email address" and the body requesting the user to verify their email by clicking a link ("Verify Your Email") are typical of phishing attempts. Legitimate companies like Apple may send verification emails, but the tone and context here raise suspicion.
Link Presence: The email contains a clickable link ("Verify Your Email") that is purportedly for email verification. The screenshot does not show the URL, but phishing emails often include malicious links that lead to fake login pages to steal credentials. CNSP emphasizes that unsolicited requests to click links for verification are a red flag.
Urgency and Vague Instructions: The email includes a statement, "If you did not make this change or believe an unauthorized person has accessed your account, click here to cancel and secure your account." This creates a sense of urgency, a common phishing tactic to prompt immediate action without critical thinking.
Generic Greeting: The email starts with "Dear User," a generic greeting often used in phishing emails. Legitimate companies like Apple typically personalize emails with the user's name.
Suspicious Elements: The email mentions "your Apple ID ([email protected])," which is a placeholder rather than a specific email address, further indicating a mass phishing campaign rather than a targeted, legitimate communication.
Phishing Indicators (per CNSP):
CNSP documentation on phishing identification lists several red flags:
Unsolicited requests for verification or account updates.
Generic greetings (e.g., "Dear User" instead of a personalized name).
Presence of links that may lead to malicious sites (not verifiable in the screenshot but implied).
Urgency or threats (e.g., "click here to cancel and secure your account").
Impersonation of trusted brands (e.g., Apple).
Email B exhibits multiple indicators: the generic greeting, unsolicited verification request, urgent call to action, and impersonation of Apple.
Option A Context:
Since the screenshot only shows email B, and the correct answer is "Only B," we can infer that email A (not shown) does not exhibit phishing characteristics. For example, A might be a legitimate email from Apple with proper personalization, no suspicious links, or a different context (e.g., a purchase confirmation rather than a verification request).
Evaluation of Options:
1. Only A: Incorrect, as email A is not shown, and the correct answer indicates B as the phishing email.
2. Only B: Correct. Email B shows clear phishing characteristics, such as impersonation, a generic greeting, an unsolicited verification link, and urgency, aligning with CNSP's phishing criteria.
3. Both A and B: Incorrect, as A is implied to be non-phishing based on the correct answer.
4. None of the above: Incorrect, as B is a phishing email.
Conclusion: Email B is a phishing email due to its impersonation of Apple, generic greeting, unsolicited verification request with a link, and use of urgency to prompt action. Since A is not shown but implied to be non-phishing, the correct answer is "Only B."


NEW QUESTION # 13
Which command will perform a DNS zone transfer of the domain "victim.com" from the nameserver at 10.0.0.1?

  • A. dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com arfxr
  • B. dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com afxr
  • C. dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com axfr
  • D. dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com axrfr

Answer: C

Explanation:
A DNS zone transfer replicates an entire DNS zone (a collection of DNS records for a domain) from a primary nameserver to a secondary one, typically for redundancy or load balancing. The AXFR (Authoritative Full Zone Transfer) query type, defined in RFC 1035, facilitates this process. The dig (Domain Information Groper) tool, a staple in Linux/Unix environments, is used to query DNS servers. The correct syntax is:
dig @<nameserver> <domain> axfr
Here, dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com axfr instructs dig to request a zone transfer for "victim.com" from the nameserver at 10.0.0.1. The @ symbol specifies the target server, overriding the system's default resolver.
Technical Details:
The AXFR query is sent over TCP (port 53), not UDP, due to the potentially large size of zone data, which exceeds UDP's typical 512-byte limit (pre-EDNS0).
Successful execution requires the nameserver to permit zone transfers from the querying IP, often restricted to trusted secondaries via Access Control Lists (ACLs) for security. If restricted, the server responds with a "REFUSED" error.
Security Implications: Zone transfers expose all DNS records (e.g., A, MX, NS), making them a reconnaissance goldmine for attackers if misconfigured. CNSP likely emphasizes securing DNS servers against unauthorized AXFR requests, using tools like dig to test vulnerabilities.
Why other options are incorrect:
A . dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com axrfr: "axrfr" is a typographical error. The correct query type is "axfr." Executing this would result in a syntax error or an unrecognized query type response from dig.
B . dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com afxr: "afxr" is another typo, not a valid DNS query type per RFC 1035. dig would fail to interpret this, likely outputting an error like "unknown query type." C . dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com arfxr: "arfxr" is also invalid, a jumbled version of "axfr." It holds no meaning in DNS protocol standards and would fail similarly.
Real-World Context: Penetration testers use dig ... axfr to identify misconfigured DNS servers. For example, dig @ns1.example.com example.com axfr might reveal subdomains or internal IPs if not locked down.


NEW QUESTION # 14
Which of the following protocols is not vulnerable to address spoofing attacks if implemented correctly?

  • A. UDP
  • B. ARP
  • C. TCP
  • D. IP

Answer: C

Explanation:
Address spoofing fakes a source address (e.g., IP, MAC) to impersonate or amplify attacks. Analyzing protocol resilience:
C . TCP (Transmission Control Protocol):
Mechanism: Three-way handshake (SYN, SYN-ACK, ACK) verifies both endpoints.
Client SYN (Seq=X), Server SYN-ACK (Seq=Y, Ack=X+1), Client ACK (Ack=Y+1).
Spoofing Resistance: Spoofer must predict the server's sequence number (randomized in modern stacks) and receive SYN-ACK, impractical without session hijacking or MITM.
Correct Implementation: RFC 793-compliant, with anti-spoofing (e.g., Linux tcp_syncookies).
A . UDP:
Connectionless (RFC 768), no handshake. Spoofed packets (e.g., source IP 1.2.3.4) are accepted if port is open, enabling reflection attacks (e.g., DNS amplification).
B . ARP (Address Resolution Protocol):
No authentication (RFC 826). Spoofed ARP replies (e.g., fake MAC for gateway IP) poison caches, enabling MITM (e.g., arpspoof).
D . IP:
No inherent validation at Layer 3 (RFC 791). Spoofed source IPs pass unless filtered (e.g., ingress filtering, RFC 2827).
Security Implications: TCP's handshake makes spoofing harder, though not impossible (e.g., blind spoofing with sequence prediction, mitigated since BSD 4.4). CNSP likely contrasts this with UDP/IP's vulnerabilities in DDoS contexts.
Why other options are incorrect:
A, B, D: Lack handshake or authentication, inherently spoofable.
Real-World Context: TCP spoofing was viable pre-1990s (e.g., Mitnick attack); modern randomization thwarts it.


NEW QUESTION # 15
What ports can be queried to perform a DNS zone transfer?

  • A. 53/TCP
  • B. None of the above
  • C. Both 1 and 2
  • D. 53/UDP

Answer: A

Explanation:
A DNS zone transfer involves replicating the DNS zone data (e.g., all records for a domain) from a primary to a secondary DNS server, requiring a reliable transport mechanism.
Why A is correct: DNS zone transfers use TCP port 53 because TCP ensures reliable, ordered delivery of data, which is critical for transferring large zone files. CNSP notes that TCP is the standard protocol for zone transfers (e.g., AXFR requests), as specified in RFC 5936.
Why other options are incorrect:
B . 53/UDP: UDP port 53 is used for standard DNS queries and responses due to its speed and lower overhead, but it is not suitable for zone transfers, which require reliability over speed.
C . Both 1 and 2: This is incorrect because zone transfers are exclusively TCP-based, not UDP-based.
D . None of the above: Incorrect, as 53/TCP is the correct port for DNS zone transfers.


NEW QUESTION # 16
......

We know deeply that a reliable CNSP exam material is our company's foothold in this competitive market. High accuracy and high quality are the most important things we always looking for. Compared with the other products in the market, our CNSP latest questions grasp of the core knowledge and key point of the real exam, the targeted and efficient Certified Network Security Practitioner study training dumps guarantee our candidates to pass the test easily. Passing exam won’t be a problem anymore as long as you are familiar with our CNSP Exam Material (only about 20 to 30 hours practice). High accuracy and high quality are the reasons why you should choose us.

CNSP Valid Exam Preparation: https://www.exam4pdf.com/CNSP-dumps-torrent.html

Report this page